Category Archives: Uncategorized

An oral fixation

I have a backward tooth. My dentist pointed out the anomalous bicuspid to his new assistant a couple weeks ago while they were making a cast for a crown to replace a cracked molar. I was in no position to inquire about it further at the time, and by the time they were finished with me for the day the matter had slipped my mind completely. As sensation returned and I began gingerly exploring that quadrant of my mouth with my tongue, I remembered the remarkable revelation and found myself more obsessed with the backward bicuspid than with the foreign object in my mouth, the temporary crown.

It’s true; the tooth is backwards. The cusp on the outward side of the tooth is significantly shorter than the cusp on the inward side, and the inward-facing cusp is longer than the inward cusps of its two neighbors. I don’t know whether the anesthesia made me extraordinarily susceptible to suggestion or whether the normal preoccupation of the human tongue with oral peculiarities has simply run amok, but I can’t stop thinking about it. Dozens of times each day I feel it with my tongue: Yep, it’s still backwards. I feel the shapes of the surrounding teeth and the corresponding teeth on the other side of my mouth: Yep, it’s still backwards.

I adore my dentist, but I’m a little miffed with him about this. The problem is, I don’t know if I feel more indignant that he never mentioned this to me before or about becoming the show-and-tell of the day. I do know what he’ll tell me, though, when I bring it to his attention at my next cleaning: he’ll say that he didn’t tell me precisely because he knew I’d become fixated on it, and that he only mentioned it when he thought I was too far gone with anesthesia to remember. And then he’ll offer to sell me the Brooklyn Bridge.

NOT the easy way out

While doing dishes with me one evening last week, my SO asked about friends of ours who are going through a divorce. I related what non-confidential information I had, and he turned back to the sink, shaking his head, and said, “Boy, she sure didn’t make things any easier for herself, did she?”

I froze in disbelief and my eyebrows shot up so far that they disappeared into my hairline. The water was running and he had his back to me, so he wasn’t aware of my immediate, unfiltered reaction. I bit my tongue and counted to ten in my head, very, very slowly. Finally I spoke, carefully and evenly: “She didn’t leave him to make things easier for herself, you know. She left because she wasn’t able to live in that situation any longer.” He seemed to consider this for a moment, then nodded agreeably.

That comment has lingered in my mind ever since. In each of the four couples we know who are recently divorced or divorcing, the woman has been at home for six years or more, caring for children who are now in elementary school. In three of the four couples, the woman is the one who initiated the divorce. No woman chooses to leave the only source of financial support she and her children have in order to make her life easier. In truth, the suddenly single woman with young children who has been out of the workforce for several years faces a daunting, uphill ordeal to secure even the most basic living requirements; the fact that she finds this path the lesser of two evils speaks volumes about how difficult she found her marriage to be.

The persistence in our society of this perspective on stay-at-home mothers boggles the mind, and its casual articulation by my own partner is a bit disconcerting. Parenting ain’t for sissies, under any circumstances. Single parenting by agonized choice requires a level of courage and purpose that makes serving in the Marines look like a walk in the park.

Another forehead-slapping moment

I’ve been working on my fiction writing lately and talking quite a bit with other writers about their work. Last week I finished listening to an unabridged audio version of a bestselling novel and realized that I’ve been working way too hard at this. I enjoyed the novel; the plot was interesting, the characters were quirky, the dialogue was hysterically funny, and the situations were wacky and amusing. It was a very entertaining read, but not even the author would call it great literature. She has published dozens of novels in various genres, all best-sellers, and makes a good living at it. She writes to formula, but her work isn’t hackneyed because she brings her imagination and sense of humor to bear on the aspects of each novel that aren’t governed by the formula: character, dialogue, setting, and plot details.

I don’t have to write great literature to be a successful writer. In fact, I’m far more likely to be successful if I don’t write great literature. That may seem surprisingly obvious, but it’s a blazing revelation that takes all kinds of pressure off my writing.

Now I just have to get myself to believe it.

Gentle with an edge

I finally watched an episode of Joan of Arcadia, which a friend recommended as something he thought I would like. (I believe his actual words were “eat it up with a spoon.”) He was right; I liked it very much. Anything Mary Steenbergen chooses to be in is something I would like to see. This particular episode also featured Annie Potts, another plus in my book.

The show reminded me of the kind of family television we used to watch when I was growing up, shows that parents didn’t mind watching with their kids and then talking about afterward. I can guess why it didn’t catch on fast enough for the network executives, though: it’s edgy but somehow gentle at the same time. No doubt the gentleness did it in, because something about the production or the writing reminded me of Buffy the Vampire Slayer. From the little bit of research I did on the show, it seems that the writers were about to put some teeth into it with the introduction of a sinister foil for Joan. It’s too bad the execs didn’t give it a chance to explore the ratings potential of such a move.

The soundtrack is awesome — it had me at the opening credits with Joan Osborn’s “One of Us” and just kept going. The CBS site for the show lists songs used in selected episodes, and it’s an impressive array of classic and new artists. I wish I had been together enough to watch this show when it first aired, though I spared myself the disappointment of its cancellation by discovering it after the fact. At least the SciFi channel seems to have taken up the baton. On some days, cable is a good thing after all.

Domicilium perfectum nervosum

“There is no real need to do housework. After a few years it doesn’t get any worse.” — Quentin Crisp

I know people whose houses are so spotless that the board of health could issue a certificate for them to serve food off their floors. Most of these people are compulsive cleaners and seem to partake in a form of distorted thinking usually associated with anorexia nervosa: no matter how immaculate their houses are, they always see dirt. They own a carpet shampooer because they use it more frequently than most people use a vacuum cleaner; they scrub the grout on their tile floors with toothbrushes.

Not everyone who cleans thoroughly and frequently suffers from some kind of mental imbalance — it is possible to be naturally neat and perfectly healthy. I suspect, however, that a large number of neatniks suffer, undiagnosed, from some sort of anxiety disorder, which they try to keep at bay by cleaning. The rest of the world may be going to hell in a handbasket, but the physical conditions within the four walls of their homes are completely under control.

As with eating disorders, the causal factors leading to cleaning disorders are many and complex, but it seems certain that social attitudes play an important role. Aphorisms such as “Cleanliness is next to godliness,” coupled with middle- and upper-class housekeeping expectations, probably account for a large part of this social component. Stir in a little insecurity, some low self-esteem, and a couple issues of Better Homes and Gardens, and you’ve got the ideal conditions for a full-blown case of House Beautiful Syndrome.

I don’t seem to suffer from this disorder, which I view as both a blessing and a curse. On the blessing side, I don’t have a lot of anxiety, although I do experience the pressures of social attitudes and expectations. On the curse side, my house NEVER resembles anything found in a magazine and I don’t feel all that driven to do something about it. I keep the Quentin Crisp quote on my refrigerator as a reminder of the two-edged nature of this state of precarious mental health: while it’s true that clutter and grime reach a certain equilibrium after a few years, I’m fairly certain that point of balance is well beyond the bounds of my own tolerance.

He, she, or it?

Yesterday, NPR’s Morning Edition carried a science story on language, specifically about evidence that gendered language influences the ways in which its speakers view the world. Lera Boroditsky, a psychologist at Stanford, has conducted a couple of studies that demonstrate the ways in which linguistic associations with gender affect our perceptions.

This isn’t exactly a newsflash for feminists, who have been saying this for years. Boroditsky’s research, however, finally lends the weight of science to the common sense arguments that progressive women and men have made against sexist language since long before anyone now living was born.

In light of this research, then, how might a language without gendered nouns, such as English, open up possibilities in the minds of its speakers? The NPR report cites an example from one of Boroditsky’s studies in which speakers of German and Spanish were asked to characterize the word “bridge,” which is feminine in German and masculine in Spanish. The bridge pictured on the NPR web page is the Golden Gate Bridge. The key words I came up with upon first seeing the picture were a combination of the respectively “feminine” and “masculine” words provided by the German and Spanish speakers: long, elegant, strong, beautiful. Had I seen a picture of the Pont-Neuf in Paris instead, I would have immediately thought of more “masculine” descriptors, such as sturdy or solid, because of the bridge’s construction. Does my being a native English speaker dispose me more readily to think flexibly about the characteristics of objects?

Sounds like an interesting topic for a follow-up study. Any psycholinguists or cognitive psychologists in the house?

Sailboats and rabbits, lions and lambs

In her poem, “For Strong Women,” Marge Piercy talks about strength as something that fills and moves us, “as the wind fills a sail.” That description brings to mind an illustration from the beloved Margaret Wise Brown children’s classic, The Runaway Bunny, in which the little bunny declares that he will become a sailboat and sail far away from his mother. If he does, she replies, she will become the wind and blow him where she wants him to go. Clement Hurd’s delightful illustration shows the little bunny in the form of a sailboat, his ears the sails that billow full with the breath of a mother bunny-shaped cloud in the sky behind him.

This notion of strength as a force that moves us and moves in us is complex and not altogether comfortable. We cannot control the wind, in direction or velocity. We can make good use of it, if we are prepared to do so when the moment is right, but we are not its master. This in turn reminds me of the Strength card in the tarot, which traditionally depicts a woman and a lion. Often the woman is shown astride the lion, riding bareback and without bridle: another image of being moved but not being in control. The woman’s lack of control, however, does not mean that the situation is out of control. The scene is usually peaceful, conveying a bond of trust between the woman and the lion. Strength is not a matter of control, but a matter of respecting and working with the forces in our lives that are greater than we are.

Finally, I remember that old adage about wind and weather, “If March comes in like a lion, it goes out like a lamb.”

People who live in glass houses shouldn’t throw books

“I hate going into a house without books. It makes me wonder what the people do.” — Mary Herbert, English major and real estate broker

I have never lived in any place where there weren’t books. I grew up in a house filled with books, and my first home away from home was a college dorm room in which books were part of the furniture. The houses of my extended family were likewise filled with books, and we always gave and received books as gifts for Christmas and birthdays.

The chief selling point for the house in which I currently live was the study — a room that could be entirely devoted to books. Unfortunately, the room has a double window and double French doors, but most days I don’t begrudge the loss of wall space too much because both allow in lots of natural light, which is ideal for reading.

There is something about books that makes a place seem comfortable. High-end furniture stores often carry elegantly crafted faux books for accessorizing the well-appointed room: leather binding with gold trim, stamped with classic titles. I’ve seen them in model homes, classy hotels, and fancy office suites. Restaurants seeking to strike a homey note with their decor place discarded textbooks and hardback novels among the baskets, antique dishware, and silk plants on their ornamental shelves.

So what, then, DO people who live in houses without books do? My best guess would be that they spend all their time making sure there aren’t any books in their houses.

Muscle memories

The ornamental pear trees that line the streets in my neighborhood have been in bloom for about a week now. Some of the blossoms have begun dropping their petals; when the wind catches them, it seems as though it’s snowing. Small drifts of white petals line the driveways and sidewalks and tiny white whirlwinds swirl down the middle of the street. Despite the vast numbers of trees and petals, there aren’t enough to blanket the ground, even directly beneath the trees. Gives me a new appreciation for just how many snowflakes are involved in a measurable snowfall!

Yesterday was a beautiful day to be outside, and I was able to spend most of it working in the yard. My muscles are deliciously sore today from all the digging, crouching, and schlepping — the aches and twinges are a physical memory of activity so enjoyable that I cheerfully overdid it. All day long I’ll get these little messages from my body reminding me of a day so gloriously spent, and the remembering will be a pleasure in itself.

No Advil for me!

Heterogeneous beds

I have decided to grow vegetables in the ornamental beds in my front yard this year. I have a perfect spot for vegetables along the south side of the house, but the entire length of that side is planted in liriope, which I want to transplant. However, I can’t transplant the liriope until the mowing strips are ready to receive it, and turning those ribbons of soilless hard-pan into planting beds is such a brutal chore that I always find something else to do instead. Maybe I should just rent a Bobcat and get it over with.

In any case, I don’t want to allow another growing season to pass without vegetables from my own yard, so I’m starting small. The day after St. Patrick’s Day I planted as many sugar snap peas as would fit along the trellises against the brick wall in the bed by the front porch. I usually grow ornamental hyacinth beans on those trellises, but I can’t plant them until the soil warms up a bit more. The peas should be done by the time the beans get to be any size, though I secretly hope that the beans will provide just enough shade in early summer to extend pea season a week or two. That, by the way, is an example of both succession planting and companion planting, for those of you keeping score at home.

I have also requested some fish pepper seedlings from a gardening friend for the planting bed along the driveway and sidewalk. Fish pepper is an African American heirloom hot pepper from the Chesapeake Bay area. The plants have beautifully variegated foliage and fruit; I fell in love with them the first time I saw a picture of them.

Perhaps my most daring move involves one of those upside-down tomato planters, which I plan to hang from a wrought iron shepherd’s crook. With cascading nasturtiums (edible flowers and leaves — great in tuna salad!) in the top of the planter, it may look like an elongated hanging basket. I should probably stick this contraption in the liriope bed along the south side of the house, just in case it doesn’t end up looking all that great, but I’m feeling a little reckless these days — I’ll probably put it in the middle of the front yard to signal my defiance against the norms of suburban lawn culture.