Tag Archives: books

People who live in glass houses shouldn’t throw books

“I hate going into a house without books. It makes me wonder what the people do.” — Mary Herbert, English major and real estate broker

I have never lived in any place where there weren’t books. I grew up in a house filled with books, and my first home away from home was a college dorm room in which books were part of the furniture. The houses of my extended family were likewise filled with books, and we always gave and received books as gifts for Christmas and birthdays.

The chief selling point for the house in which I currently live was the study — a room that could be entirely devoted to books. Unfortunately, the room has a double window and double French doors, but most days I don’t begrudge the loss of wall space too much because both allow in lots of natural light, which is ideal for reading.

There is something about books that makes a place seem comfortable. High-end furniture stores often carry elegantly crafted faux books for accessorizing the well-appointed room: leather binding with gold trim, stamped with classic titles. I’ve seen them in model homes, classy hotels, and fancy office suites. Restaurants seeking to strike a homey note with their decor place discarded textbooks and hardback novels among the baskets, antique dishware, and silk plants on their ornamental shelves.

So what, then, DO people who live in houses without books do? My best guess would be that they spend all their time making sure there aren’t any books in their houses.

The writer’s dilemma

In a report on NPR’s All Things Considered yesterday, fantasy writer Naomi Novik said something that really got my attention: “The biggest danger to most authors, to most storytellers, is not that somebody is going to steal your work and pass it along — it is that nobody is ever going to see your work.”

The quote, part of a story on anti-piracy technology in e-books, perfectly captures the conflict that writers (and most other artists) face, a dynamic tension that can leave the cautious nearly paralyzed. If I put my work out into the public arena, will something happen to it, or to me? If I don’t put my work out there, what’s the point? This is especially painful if one dreams of making some kind of living from one’s work; the old saw, “Why buy the cow when you can get the milk for free?” comes unhelpfully to mind.

I know a writer who has been shopping a science fiction novella around for a couple of years. He’s gotten a nibble or two, but no solid bites. Because his story has been making the rounds, he is concerned that someone might lift his idea, which is admittedly pretty original, and beat him to the publishing punch. This concern has grown to such a degree that he decided to publish the story himself rather than risk having it languish in some editorial slush pile. All in all, this is a pretty good choice because it allows him to avoid both of the dangers Ms. Novik points out: his work will not get stolen, nor will it go unread.

Maybe there’s hope for us writers after all.

Restless reader

I am a compulsive and restless reader. At any one time, I’m in the midst of a novel and at least two non-fiction books plus a number of periodicals. I keep lighter reading magazines in the bathroom at all times and cart the more cerebral journals and reviews around with me, just in case I’m stuck in traffic or stop for a cup of tea somewhere. I have a stack of books next to my chair in the living room, a stack of books on the shelf next to my bed, and two shelves of “new arrivals” in the study.

In theory, once I finish reading something it can go on the appropriate bookshelf in the study. The only hitch is if I want to take notes from the book before I shelve it, in which case it sits around, little Post-It flags sticking out the side, until I get around to the task. In an ideal world, I would sit down right away — possibly even as I read — and write out the notes while they are still fresh in my mind. With the current time lag, I sometimes look at a flagged page and have no earthly idea what I wanted to glean from it. Fortunately I’m not one to lay awake at night until I figure it out; experience has taught me that anything I have to work that hard to remember is never worth it. Thank goodness I’m fairly good at letting things go.

Sometimes I worry I’m a little too good at it.

The contagion of composition

What is it that causes a person to write, to want to write, even to need to write? Lots of people never have the desire to write, indeed could pass their entire lives quite happily without ever having learned to write–yet others seem unable to prevent themselves from writing. (Although the number of compulsive writers seems quite the larger to me, I doubt my circle of acquaintances constitutes a statistically valid sampling of the population.)

The same questions have haunted neurologist Alice Flaherty, so she did something about it: she wrote a book, The Midnight Disease. (It seems she is in some part the subject of her own research.) I haven’t read the book yet because I just purchased it, but it’s on the top of my reading pile, which I’m sure has caused a great deal of grumbling among the other books whose patient queue has been jumped.

Maybe I’ll feed my own disease and write a review of the book when I finish it.

Intellectual generosity

“Intellectual generosity” has cropped up a lot in my reading as of late, particularly in the acknowledgements sections of books. Dr. Stephen Fowler has described intellectual generosity as something that arises from the practice of finding God in all things (2001 lecture at Loyola University). Such practice cultivates an openness and humility that seeks the greater good and sees others as fellow laborers in this work rather than as rivals. I think that this quality would be necessary for anyone engaged in intellectual pursuits, but Dr. Fowler’s comments suggest that intellectual generosity is seldom modeled in places of higher education. What a sad thought.